Solar Builder

MAY-JUN 2018

Solar Builder focuses on the installation/construction of solar PV systems. We cover the latest PV technology (modules, mounting, inverters, storage, BOS) and equip installers/contractors with tips and tools to make informed purchasing decisions.

Issue link: http://digital.solarbuildermag.com/i/979544

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 38 of 55

SOLARBUILDERMAG.COM | 39 small footprint and narrow inter-row spacing. The combination packs in panels, yet the inter-row spacing is wide enough to allow for the working room needed for ease of installation and post-installation maintenance." But the tilt decision isn't one-size-fits all. Everest Solar Systems notes tilt angle efficiency correlates to latitude — the higher the latitude often requires a higher tilt. The latitude in Hawaii, for instance, allows a system to be virtually flat, but there needs to be enough tilt to keep the rain from pooling and to keep dust off the modules. Brandon Gwinner, regional sales manager, SunModo, puts that minimum at a 4-degree tilt. "The tilt degree is dependent on the region/location and optimum output based on TSRF," he says. "The minimal tilt degree racking systems are typically to maximize the number of modules you can get on a roof without your rear post being 8 ft off the roof and to get the most energy density/power density per the project." There are also some wind/snow load considerations that can keep tilt below a certain height/tilt degree, as well as parapet walls and billowing of wind. The installer has to find the balance between production and engineering capabilities. Also, installers looking to maximize production in summer months should con- sider using lower tilt angles than installers looking to maximize production in winter months. In snowy northern climates, Everest Solar recommends a 10-degree system tilt angle, which is better for shed- ding snow, plus the wider inter-row spac- ing allows more room for snow to land without piling up and casting a shadow or covering the modules. "If you can hit your power goal with a 10-degree system, then 10-degree would be the system of choice. If not, 5-degree racking can enable a successful system when 10-degree wouldn't fit enough panels to generate enough power," Coles said. Commercial installations have signifi- cantly more requirements than residential installations, so understanding jurisdic- tional requirements at the onset of the project will make the process go smoothly. Some states, like Oregon, do not require extra engineering when the tilt is under 18 in. on the back edge of the array, based on a prescriptive path. So, cost analysis vs. ease of permitting is a factor for tilt deci- sions too. The inter-row spacing issue Tilted PV panels cast shadows on the rows of modules behind them, necessitat- ing a gap between rows to minimize the effects of production loss due to shadows cast on panels in anterior module rows. Here are a few ideas to mitigate the impact of this phenomenon on your PV installa- tion via Peter Abou Chacra, engineering consultant, SunModo. Reduce the tilt of your south-facing array. For peak energy production on a per-module basis, PV modules have an ideal incident angle with solar rays emanating from the sun. For some installations, however, it may make sense to reduce the tilt of the modules to a less optimal incident angle. Though this means less production on a per module-basis, it can mean a sig- nificant increase in the daily unshaded collection time for the array. This gain in effective collection time can offset the losses caused by a sub-optimal tilt for the module itself. Using software dedicated to modeling and analyzing a system's performance at a different tilt angle and inter-row spacing should figure out the best path. Locate your system on a south-facing slope. Even a five-degree inclination can have a marked impact on the amount of inter-row spacing required. This can significantly increase the number of modules you can fit in a given area. Consider 3-in-landscape or 4-in-land- scape monoslope installations. Coupled with a low tilt, this strategy can reduce inter-row spacing significantly on a given installation since modules on the same structure and slope don't require significant spacing between them. This can be particularly effective if you can gradually elevate the anterior mono- slope PV structures as you work your way north through the site. Chris Crowell is the managing editor of Solar Builder.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Solar Builder - MAY-JUN 2018